CTTT File No: RT 10/56631 & RT 11/21415
<p>
TO: Consumer Trader & Tenancy Tribunal NSW
<p>
Regarding the upcoming hearing of two application simultaneously and with a date yet to be set...
<h2>
OBJECTION TO MEMBER ROSSER PRESIDING
</h2>

I, Joe Stojsic, object to Member Rosser presiding because at the last hearing (resulting in adjournment) she made a grave error (confirmed by The Office of Fair Trading) when she stated: "There is a question about whether a Tribunal has the power to make an order
for compensation for non-economic loss [to a tenant], but there is no doubt that a landlord can not get non-economic loss from a tenant." In actual fact the Residential Tenancy Act affords the same potential for non-economic compensation to both Landorn and Tenant.

<br>
<h2>
OBJECTION TO MEMBER MCILHATTON PRESIDING
</h2>

I, Joe Stojsic, object to Member McIlhatton presiding because she denied me natural justice in the 15 December 2010 hearing on the following points:
<ol>
<li> She did not follow due procedure
 regarding Applicant's legal representation (as outlined above).</li>

<li>She did not follow due procedure in establishing the Tribunal's jursidiction at the outset.</li>

<li>She showed bias and pre-judgement of the outcome by calling the Applicant <i>tenant</i> all the way through the hearing before she was deemed so and even when she was asking me to explain why I thought the Applicant is a <i>lodger</i> she called the Applicant a <i>tenant</i> <b>THREE</b> times in a row.


<li>She interrupted me throughout, forcing me to backtrack a little each time using <b>the same words</b> after her interuption. So she saw each time that I was saying nothing objectionable yet not once did she apologise for those intimidating interuptions.

<li>Linda's representative Martin was allowed to interrupt the Member throughout (while I did not do so even once).

<li>She squeezed the hearing into a thirty minute timeslot (she had another hearing coming up).

</ol>
<p><br><br>
Joe Stojsic