|
Dr. Felix Valyi
The study of Jainism has been
neglected for a long time. It was considered to be an insignificant
offshoot of Hinduism. In France only Guerinot dedicated his life
to the analysis of the original sources of Jaina Philosophy. The
Indologists of France were absorbed by the study of orthodox Brahmanism
with a few exceptions, such as the great Burnouf, whose “Introduction
to the History of Buddhism” is a classic, and Emile Senart, who made
a deep study of Ashoka’s Inscriptions, while Sylvain Levi specialized
in the Sanskrit sources of Buddhist Philosophy. Guerinot’s monograph
on Jainism is an outstanding work, a monument of erudition and philosophical
appreciation.
In Germany, an important group
of Indologists with Herman
Jacobi at their head took up a scientific investigation of the Jaina
Tradition, but in France the Sorbonne and the College de France neglected
Jainism as a field of study, although Sylvain Levi repeatedly warned
his disciples that the unexplored field of Jaina Studies deserves the
attention of Indian scholars.
undoubtely the originality of
Mahavira’s philosophy which dominates the Jaina community appears of
the highest importance from the point of view of Indian culture.
The fact that a small minority of Jainas, not exceeding one and a half
million, is submerged among the hundreds of millions of Hindus, should
not close our eyes to the significance of Jaina Philosophy for the origins
of Indian Thought.
Mahavira, the 24th Tirthankara,
is now recognized as one of the greatest thinkers of Ancient India,
the equal of the Buddha in virtue of his profundity and his character.
The contamporaneity of the two greatest sages of Ancient India is accepted
as a historic fact: the two lived in the same 6th Century before Christ,
in the same province of Magadha, preaching in the same towns and villages,
at Rajagrha and Vaisali. They must have met and exchanged ideas
according to all psychological probabilities, although we do not possess
textual evidence concerning their personal relations.
The objective analysis of Mahavira’s
and Buddha’s Thought shows the many common points which characterize
Jainism and Buddhism. Ahimsa and Nirvana are concepts which belong
the both systems. If we go deeply into the origins of these concepts,
we are bound to accept the Jaina Tradition as the source of these specific
aspects of Indian Thought. Jainism with its pre-historic background
and its 24 Tirthankaras preceded Buddhism by several centuries, although
we cannot accept Jaina mythology which although we cannot accept Jaina
mythology which obscured the history of the community. Nevertheless
the historicity not only of Mahavira, but of Parsva, the 23rd Tirthankara,
who lived 250 years before Mahavira, in the 8th century before Christ,
the very century which gave birth to the first authentic Upanisads,
is now beyond doubt. Even the name of Neminatha, the 22nd Tirthankara,
was found on a copperplate, which authorizes the historians of Ancient
India to accept the probability of the existence of pre-historic Tirthankaras,
however fantastic the chronology attributed by Jaina mythology seems
to the scientific mind.
The historic existence of two
Jaina Orders at the time of the Buddha has been verified; both had preceded
Buddhism as monastic institutions. The Order founded by Mahavira
was a simple organizational reform reorganizing the Order of Parsva.
The Jaina communities were long divided and still quarrel about the
authenticity of their sects.
Both Mahavira and Buddha were
princes of the ksatriya tribes, in revolt against the privileges of
the Brahmin priesthood. Jainism represents the first social revolution
in Indian history, opening the gates of knowledge to the ordinary people,
accepting in the sangha whoever was willing to submit to the severe
discipline of the Order. The Buddha himself must mortification
during the years of meditation under the Bodhi Tree, before proclaiming
the Middle Path as the way to Enlightenment between self-torture and
pleasure-seeking.
The essential difference between
Jainism and Buddhism is just this extreme severity which Mahavira has
imposed upon the monks of his order, who must renounce all pleasures
and live a life of total abstention from every point of view.
They were forbidden to eat even tomatoes, onions, potatoes as containing
germs of living creatures, and the respect for All Life, for all that
grows and lives on earth and in the air, became an orthodox dogma.
The most severe form of Ahimsa is the principle which unites all the
four sects of Jainism in their horror of war. Their division into
“Digambaras” and “Svetambaras”, into multi-puja sects and the two sects
which reject al image-worship, Stanakavasis and Terapanthis, should
not hide their essential allegiance to the principle of non-violence
as the common ground of all Jainas.
Mahatma Gandhi’s mother was a
Jaina, his guru at Porbandar, in his native city, was an eminent Jaina
sage, and his heart was since childhood impressed by the Jaina tradition
of Ahimsa which became the guiding star of all his life. The historians
of contemporary India should not forget this decisive influence in Gandhiji’s
career which determined the destiny of the nation.
Mediaeval Hinduism has proclaimed
both Jainism and Buddhism “Heresies” opposed
to the Vedic culture. The Brahmin priesthood saw a danger to their
privileges in the fact that both Jainism and Buddhism gave access to
the lower castes to higher knowledge, and wanted to monopolize the wisdom
of ancient India for themselves as a source of prestige and income.
Recent research has dissipated the false pretenses of mediaeval orthodoxy
as the sole custodians of Indian Wisdom. The reactionary pandits
are fighting a losing battle against the enlightened opinion of critical
scholarship which no recognizes that the original spirit of Ancient
India is to be found in the teachings of Mahavira and Buddha, who might
differ in the way Ahimsa should be applied in daily life, but fully
agree in rejecting the monopoly of Orthodox Brahmanism, as ministerpreted
by the mediaeval commentators. Philosophical Brahmanism is an
integral part of a common heritage of all the great sages of the Upanisadic
Age, in which both Jainism and Buddhism share, accepting the ideal of
universality and rejecting the excesses of ritualism. Both insist
on the necessity for the individual to develop his mind through his
own spiritual effort and to ascent to a higher level without any intermediary
between himself and the Divine Powers.
The discipline of body and mind
prescribed by Ancient Indian Thought constitutes the most original contribution
of India to human psychology. Its bases is Yoga and Jainism is
pure Yoga in its attempt to liberate the spirit from all earthly forces.
There is Jaina Yoga, as there is Buddhist Yoga and Hindu Yoga, with
this difference: Mediaeval Orthodoxy corrupted the original spirit of
Yoga which became a tool of fakes, thousands of fakes who abuse religion
for personal aggrandizement.
Both Mahavira and Buddha must
be understood as Masters of Yoga, who laid the foundations of Indian
Psychology-showing the way towards spiritual perfection, raising human
nature to a higher level and demonstrating the possibility of attaining
Enlightenment which means cosmic consciousness, selfidentification with
all life, with the Universe in the service of the highest ideal ever
attained in history: Selflessness.
The Jaina System of philosophy
has developed a theory of Karma of immense interest: according to Jainism,
the soul is originally pure, but it becomes contaminated by material
particles through contact with the world. The task of the Jaina
saint is to liberate his soul from all these particles through absolute
renunciation and to recover the purity of his soul. Purity and
perfection are the ideals which India borrowed from the Jaina tradition.
Only the methods vary, but the ideal is the same.
Modern psychology refuses to assent
to this contempt of all matter. Human nature I considered to-day
as one single entity, divided into body and mind, but trying to integrate
the two aspects of man into a harmonious whole. Like the two aspects
of man into a harmonious whole. Like the Christian doctrine, Hindu
thought separated body and mind is two incompatible entities and looked
upon the soul as a slave of physiology to be liberated by religious
training. The modern view of mankind does not accept this radical
division of the material and the spiritual. Nevertheless the ideal
of spiritual freedom, freedom from all the contingencies of the industrial
civilization which have enslaved the Western world, makes the study
of Indian thought very instructive for modern man eager to disentangle
his inner life from the shackles of materialism. Ancient India
has proved the potentiality of such perfect spiritual freedom, even
if we concede that only exceptional individuals of immense will-power
have ever attained the highest form of Liberation of the spirit.
The Jainas themselves recognize
that the 24th Tirthamkara was the last in this cycle of earthly existence
and that it is impossible today to attain the highest spiritual level.
The Jaina saints with all their rigorous discipline are still in bondage
to physiology, although they demonstrate every day the possibility of
reducing such bondage to the absolute minimum. Mahavira is essentially
interesting from the psychological point of view as the incarnation
of Will Power, Spiritual Will is its purest form.
Ahimsa is a principle of universal
love, for the single purpose of transforming human nature from the animal
plane into a spiritual sphere such as all historic religions tried to
promote. Jainism served as a ferment in the history of India,
fertilizing the noblest elements in Indian character. Although
the Jaina communities have degenerated and share in the moral decay
of mankinl, Mahavira’s personality shines high above the vulgarity of
our age and deserves to be recognized as one of the greatest sages of
all history.